Showing posts with label great recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label great recession. Show all posts

Monday, December 28, 2015

Bush Was In Fact a Better Jobs Creator than Obama!

George W Bush will certainly not go down in history as one of our nation’s great job creators, but one thing is for certain, he was far better at creating jobs than President Obama has turned out to be.  I know, on the surface the numbers say otherwise and what a convenient argument for Democrats they make.  But the reality is the number of jobs created is just one piece of a complex puzzle.  When you consider the economic environment each of these presidents operated in, which is a must if you care to make an honest argument, job creation turns far in Bush’s favor.

As an example, let’s first look at Bill Clinton, the great job creator, and see just how he did it.

Clinton is credited with creating 23 million jobs according to Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reporting.  That’s pretty darn impressive no matter what you think about Slick Willy but to give all the credit to Bill himself would be wrong.  Yes Clinton played a very big role in job creation, he also had a boat load of help and good fortune along the way.

First, Bill Clinton came to office heading in to the 4
th year of what became our nation’s greatest decade of economic growth.  What kick started that growth?  A few things, two of the biggies being the technology of the personal computer and internet which, at the time, were rapidly being integrated into business.  That integration created the largest leap in increased productivity since the introduction of the gasoline engine at the turn of the 20th century.  George H W Bush’s massive military spending cuts, made possible by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war, had huge positive effects on the economy as well.  These two economic growth factors gave Bill Clinton a huge leg up at the start of his presidency. 

But things got even better for Bill as record low oil prices played their part as well and the fact that there were no major wars that took place on his watch which would have upset global trade and chewed up a big chunk of the federal budget.  And the most significant attributing factor that nobody ever seems to mention is the number of able bodied men and women who were unemployed and looking for work when Clinton took office.  When Clinton took office, unemployment was relatively high, at 7.1% and was coupled with good labor participation rate meaning that there were plenty of folks lined up and ready to grab one of those jobs the robust economy was creating almost in its own. 

Bill Clinton could not have been dealt a better hand in regards to job creation and is why he was able to log 23 million jobs created on his watch.  He of course did his part, mostly by not imposing anti-business policies or hurtful regulations.

But as the saying goes, all good things must come to an end and so did the decade long growth spirt which ended after Clinton’s 7th year in office.  During his final year, the economy cooled off significantly and for the first time in his presidency, Slick Willy recorded several months of negative job growth.  This was the start of what would become the 2001 recession which officially started just two months after he left office.


Enter George W Bush (Bush43)

A decade of robust economic growth had just come to an end, unemployment was at near record lows and the economy was just starting to slip in to recession.  By all accounts, Bush should have been in significant trouble but instead he managed to minimize the effects of the recession, hold the economy stable and create enough jobs to maintain the low unemployment rate handed off to him by his predecessor.  On his watch Bush turned in 44 months of unemployment at or lower than Clinton’s 2 term 5.1% average, 31 of those months being below 5.0%.  He managed this despite dealing with negative global economic factors caused by the single largest terrorist attack our nation had ever experienced, fighting two wars and last but certainly not least, having to fight the coming effects of the housing bubble resulting from policies that attributed to much of his predecessor success.

At the time the housing bubble began to show signs of real danger and started to have an adverse effect on the economy, unemployment was still held at a mere 4.7% due to the Bush Administration economic policies.  And while Bush was not gifted with any of the pro-growth economic factors afforded to his predecessor and spent his first year in office tuning around the small recession he inherited, he still managed to create 8.7 million jobs before the bottom fell out.  Had the bubble not burst and the economy remained on its same trajectory, Bush would have ended his tenure having created roughly 11 million jobs.  And while this figure may not look all too impressive standing on its own, when you consider that unemployment had been pushed to its lower limits during the Clinton Administration and the large number of negative economic factors Bush fought against throughout his 2 terms in office, 11 million jobs created would have in fact been pretty impressive.

But the bottom did fall out which spurred the greatest recession since the Great Depression.  In the end Bush had a 2 term unemployment average of 5.6% and if you were to exclude the 19 month downturn heading in to the Great Recession, Bush’s 77 month unemployment average was an impressive 5.2%.

In summary, Bush was not handed an economy with high unemployment and a robust economy creating jobs almost on its own, Bush instead was handed a someone neutral economy that had just experienced its longest growth period history.  The 2001 recession was a natural occurrence to such an end, it was short, shallow and most of all, it was dealt with, allowing Bush to carry on in the healthy economic environment that afforded him 4 years of unemployment figures that match or exceeded the great job creator’s {Bill Clinton} 5.1% 2 term average.  Last, Bush’s second term as president was marred with the housing bubble bursting and collapse of our nation’s financial sector.  But as horrible as the recession was in a real sense, politically it was a gift to Obama, or at least is should have been.


The Gift of the Great Recession and what Obama Did With It

Sure Obama took over as President in the depths of the Great Recession but what was really handed over to him was an incredible opportunity to emerge as the President who saved the US economy, all the pieces were in place to make that happen and yet he somehow managed to piss it all away.

The fact of the matter was that most of the hard work to right the heavily listing ship had already been accomplished on George W Bush’s watch.  Bush did include President Elect Obama in many of the discussions and even consulted with Obama on some of the decision making processes as he knew this would soon be Obama’s recession to deal with, but it was the actions of the Bush Administration that set the wheels of change in motion.  Dozens of provisions in the TARP had already been implemented and their effects begun to stabilized the financial sector before the change of command.  As well, the monetary policy of Quantitative Easing had already been implemented to stimulate the economy, alone with other emergency actions taken by the Bush administration as the walls began to cave in.

And so it was, 5 months after Barack Obama took office that the National Bureau of Economic Research determined that in June of 2009 the Great Recession officially came to an end. Yes, the efforts put forth by the Bush Administration had in fact done their job.  All that was left to do now was for the newly elected president to instill confidence in the American business person, business investors and the middle class that that the economy was in fact stable again so that spending and investment would resume.  Unfortunately for our nation, economic policy was not President Obama’s strong suite and in his own naivety and inexperience as a leader he placed his personal agenda in front of the good of the nation with devastating effect.

From the very start of his term as POTUS, Obama pushed for and received, through his Democratic controlled congress, three highly unpopular pieces of legislation that proved detrimental to an already frail economy desperately trying to recover.

First, a near $1 trillion stimulus package, largely crafted by Obama’s “economic team” before even taking office.  The stimulus offered little if anything in the way of new jobs creation.  The “shovel ready” jobs fallacy the new president used to sell his stimulus to the American people was flawed on its face and at his own much later admission, turned out to be a failure.  Instead of a package to stimulate job growth, the President’s stimulus provided for more relief to individuals and families which Obama promised would somehow magically lift 2 million people out of poverty.  This too failed and today, the number who live in poverty under the care and protection of President Obama has increase somewhere in the neighborhood of 6 million.  Last, Obama’s stimulus package had a large green energy component that again, also failed.  But worse than it failing was the cold hard fact that it had nothing to do with immediate job creation but instead everything to do with Obama’s long term agenda.  The American people and business investors saw right through Obama’s stimulus ploy which was the first of several actions that broke their confidence in both the new President and the economy.  The vote on the bill was a tell tail sign of things to come as well passing in both the Democratic controlled House and Senate in a near party line vote.  Republicans obviously shared the same sentiment for the stimulus deal as did business persons, investors and the majority of the middle class, they saw it as hurtful to the growth of the economy and they were right!

Second, the Auto Industry bailout.  The American people were already pissed that they had to bail out Wall Street and now the President was suggesting a massive bailout for the failing auto industry.  Most preferred that the normal course of bankruptcy be allowed to occur but the President was adamant about the bailout because of course, like the stimulus, it gave him a vehicle to push his green energy agenda.  This was another clear sign to investors and business owners that the best interest of the economy was not the top priority of this President.

And just as the stimulus was a massive failure, so was the bailout as both GM and Chrysler still ended up filing for bankruptcy although Team Obama meddled in that process as well in order to protect the interests of the auto unions which the bank restructure most defenatly would have come down hard on.  Nearly two thirds of American’s opposed the auto industry bailout however, Obama showed early on in his presidency that he had little regard to the will of the people.  Today, a huge portion of both GM’s and Chrysler’s taxpayer funded bailout has been forgiven and Chrysler is no longer American owned.

Third was ObamaCare.  There was significant outrage across the nation when President Obama made it crystal clear that ObamaCare was the top agenda item, vowing that healthcare reform legislation would be passed during his first year in office.  As each new piece of the bill was introduced, across the nation town hall meetings were erupting in chaos as small and large business owners alike expressed their outrage over the hundreds of provisions in the law, most of which did not work in favor of creating a better and more stable economy.  Even before its passage in to law, small and large businesses began making employment decisions based on the effect they believed the law would have on their business and now that it is in fact law, small and medium businesses hiring practices have been significantly impacted in a very negative way.  And here we are, five years later and ObamaCare is still negatively impacting small and medium business owners and stifling job growth. 

And in a sick twist of ObamaCare irony, it took 14 million taxpayer funded recipients of the Medicaid expansion to generate roughly 1 million new healthcare sector jobs.  The Obama Administration likes to call this an expansion of the private sector job market but any rational thinking person understands that it is nothing but a government created, taxpayer subsidized jobs program.  Wouldn’t it have been so much nicer if the economy of those 14 million were improved such that allowed them to become active participants in the healthcare insurance marketplace on their own instead of the recipient of another government run, taxpayer funded entitlement program?

And Obama’s suppression of economic growth did not end at these three pieces of legislation as he quickly put his team to work in trying to think of every way possible that they could somehow push his green energy agenda forward by somehow disguising it as an economic recovery program.  From that we got wonderful failures such as Cash for Clunkers and a mountain of new federal regulations that weakened instead of strengthened small business owners and investors belief in the nation’s economy.  President Obama also did not possess the political nor personal maturity to put off his war on coal until the economic crises was over.  Instead the threat of cap and trade emerged along with another mountain of regulations the targeted the energy sector which only further troubled those waiting for signs of a stable economy so that they could begin to start spending and investing again. 

As a result of all Obama’s economic blunders and the pushing of his many progressive agendas in the midst of the largest economic crisis since the Great Depression, the economy shed another 4.6 million jobs during his first year in office.  Pile that on to the 4.4 million jobs which had already been lost during the previous 18 months and you have a jobs hole in the economy 9 million deep that needed to be filled.  But in order to start filling that hole, confidence would need to be instilled in business owners and investors before the would start taking on any new risk, a task that President Obama proved that he simply was not up to. 

So despite there being enough economic indicators for the National Bureau of Economic Research to call the end of the recession in June of 2009, sadly the Obama administration did more to tear down Americans confidence in the economy than to restore it.  It was not just small business owners and investors who were not willing to take on any new risks, the middle class chose not to either and instead of spending they held back, afraid of what might happened, tomorrow, next week, next month and even next year.  The uncertainty of the poor Obama economic recovery plan had everyone worried and rightly so.

Obama had an economy dying to recover with near zero inflation to deal with and interest rates at near zero as well.  Over 4 million jobs has been lost thus creating a more than able unemployed workforce just waiting to take their jobs back.  And there was plenty of money just waiting to be sunk into the economy by investors as well.   The only thing lacking was business and investor confidence and it was clear that this was not going to be restored any time soon.

Within 9 months of Obama taking office unemployment rose from 8.3% to 10% where it hovered for the next 6 month before finally starting its lengthy downward trend, remaining at 9.0% or greater for 30 consecutive months.  Obama would not see the unemployment rate fall to the same point it was when he first took office for a full 3 years and sadly that lower rate was not achieved through job growth but instead by a drop in the labor participation rate.  Americans were simply giving up on looking for work, a sad trend that continues today with more than 11 million Americans having fallen out of the work force.


There is a lot to digest here I know but what it really all boils down to is the given the set of economic circumstances that were passed to President Obama should have easily resulted in job creation numbers  in line with Bill Clinton.  What we have instead is a situation where, seven years after taking office, the nation is still short of breaking even by 4.3 million jobs when you take in to account the increase in the number of people eligible to enter the workforce.

Had the rolls been reversed and Bush applied his economic policies to the economy handed to Obama it is more than clear that our nation would have been significantly better off in regards to job growth.  This is by no means an endorsement of George W Bush’s economic policies but it is however, a scathing indictment to the utter failure of President Obama’s.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Democrats Praise Obama’s Jobs Creation - Do They Have A Point?


What is the real story behind jobs creation under President Obama’s leadership?  If we are to believe what democrats are saying, President Obama is responsible for the most successful jobs recovery in history while republicans are quick to scorn the president’s economic and job growth policies as being a failure.

So, which is it, success or failure, or do the facts land us someplace between the two? 

Let us take an in-depth look at jobs creation under this president and see for ourselves just exactly where we stand on jobs creation under the leadership of President Obama.  To carry out this endeavor, we will rely heavily on the assistance of the Bureau of Labor Statistics who has done a fine job in compiling monthly jobs figures.

To get started, let us first set the stage with some basic facts:

·         Between 80,000 and 170,000 new jobs {125,000 average} must be added to the economy each month in order to keep pace with the nation’s population growth
 

·         As the nation entered into the Great Recession, in the 2nd quarter of 2007 monthly jobs creation dropped below what was necessary to keep pace with population growth
 

·         The economy began to shed jobs in the 1st quarter of 2008
 

·         Barack Obama was sworn in as President of the United States on January 20, 2009
 

·         The nation’s unemployment rate was 7.8% when Barack Obama took office


Okay, with that out of the way, we can begin digging in to the numbers!


The Jobs Situation Before Obama Took Office

Heading in to the Great Recession job growth began to decline right around the start of 2007.  By the 1st quarter of 2008 that job growth reversed and the economy actually began to shed jobs, a trend that would last for 23 months straight.

It was in September of 2008, when the Lehman Brothers bank collapsed, that the recession took its hardest hit.  The economic impact of the collapse included an immediate spike in job losses.  Job losses spiked a second time in November, pushing the rate of loss over one half million jobs per month, a figure that is maintained until May of the following year.

The first major step to mitigate job loss and restore economic growth was the creation of the Troubled Asset Relief Program or TARP.  TARP was a group of programs created in an effort to stabilize the country’s financial sector in the wake of the financial crisis.  The $787 billion {later reduced to $475 billion} TARP fund was created in early October of 2008 when President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act in to law.  The distribution of TARP funds began in late October of 2008 and continued through the end of 2009. 

TARP was not the only Bush Administration measure aimed to thwart off the negative effects of the recession, but it was certainly the largest and most effective.


Obama Takes Office and Gets to Work

Barack Obama is sworn in as the President of the United States on January 20, 2009.  At the time Obama took office and as a result of the recession, the US economy had at this point shed 4.4 million jobs and the unemployment rate had risen from the mid 4% rate, enjoyed by his predecessor for most of the 2 years leading up to the recession, to 7.8%.

The Obama transition team went straight to work on a stimulus plan that the president-elect had many times spoken of during his campaign for president, a plan intended to create shovel ready jobs and to quickly revitalize the economy through a massive stimulus.  By the time Barack Obama officially took office the creation of the stimulus was well on its way however, the stimulus package put before Obama for the first time in his official capacity as the President of the United States differed slightly from his own vision. 

Changes were made and a stimulus package that better reflected the new president’s desire was then passed in congress and signed in to law by President Obama just a few days shy of a full month in office.


A Look at the Stimulus

In December of 2008, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published a report which indicated that the recession was deeper than earlier predicted and was expected to lose an additional 4 million jobs.  This report prompted president-elect Obama to up the game from his commitment of creating 2.5 million jobs in two years to creating 3 million and tasked his team to get more aggressive with their plan.   At the end of the day, President Obama’s 3 member Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) proposed and the president agreed to a plan which the CEA claimed would create or save 3.5 million jobs in the first two years.

Understanding that 3.5 million jobs over a two year period would hardly keep pace with population growth much less put to work the millions who had already lost their jobs, Republicans in congress remained skeptical of the stimulus plan being proposed by democrat’s and were calling for significantly more spending on job creating infrastructure programs.  Democrat’s on the other hand were more in favor of shoring up a safety net by expanding unemployment benefits and increasing food stamp benefits.  In the end the plan did emphasize shovel ready infrastructure jobs intended to create these jobs quickly but not near as much spending was allocated to short term jobs creation as most economist believe was needed.

The plan had both short and long term goals with some of the spending spread out over decade however, the bulk of the provisions in the package were funded immediately and ended after the 1st and 2nd year.

And on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, better known as “the stimulus” was signed into law.  Again, the primary objective of the stimulus was to immediately create jobs!


The Bleeding Continued

With TARP working to stabilize the financial sector and Obama’s stimulus signed in to law, America’s unemployed labor force stood poised and ready to get to work.  Unfortunately, new jobs failed to transpire.

Despite efforts to kick start the economy, 15 of the 19 months following the passage of the stimulus experience job losses 10 of which reported losses in excess of 200,000 jobs.  Unemployment continued to rise and in October of 2009 peaked at 10% and then held steady between 9.8% and 9.9% for the following six months.  During this 19 month period the economy shed another 4.6 million net jobs and if you were to factor in the number of jobs that the White House economists projected the stimulus would save/create {3.5 million in two years}, the economy could have actually shed as many as 7.4 million jobs during this 19 month period.

Finally, in May of 2010, after experiencing the first consecutive months of jobs growth in 25 months, the unemployment rate dropped to 9.6% and over the following five months, bounced between 9.4% and 9.5%.  However, the drop in unemployment was not all good news as the economy shed another 282,000 jobs over the same period.  The lowering of the unemployment rate coupled with a continued loss of jobs told a bleak story, thousands of people had given up on looking for work!

A milestone was reached in September of 2010 which marked the final month to record jobs losses during the Great Recession.

It took the Obama Administration over one and a half years to stop the bleeding but it did finally stop.  Unfortunately, over that time an additional 4.6 million net jobs were lost on top of the 4.4 million that were lost prior to his taking office. 


The Jobs Hole that Needs to be Filled

There are three goals in the jobs recovery process.  First of course is to stop the loss of jobs; second, to create enough jobs to keep up with population growth; and last, to fill the hole of jobs lost during the recession.

It will be forever debated as to the reason why, but it was 20 months into President Obama’s first term in office {19 months since the stimulus was passed} before the economy finally stopped shedding jobs.  All tolled, 32 months passed from the time jobs first dropped into the negative numbers until the bleeding was permanently stopped.  Over those 32 months a net 9 million jobs were lost.

Beyond the jobs that were physically lost is the loss of jobs that were needed to keep pace with population growth meaning that for any given month approximately 125,000 new jobs were needed to accommodate new entrance into the work force. 

During the two years of the Great Recession, prior to President Obama taking office, 14 months experienced a net zero job growth and the remaining 10 months record an averaged shortfall of 28,000 jobs per month.  This equated to an additional 2 million new jobs deficit.  And in the 73 months that President Obama has been in office an additional 9.1 million new jobs were required just to maintain status quo.


In total 11.1 million new jobs were needed to make up for the shortfall in keeping pace with population growth.  Add to this the 9 million physical jobs the economy shed during the Great Recession and we arrive at a jobs hole 20.1 million deep that needed filling.

And so begins the task of filling that hole.


Now a Look at Job Creation

 

·         After Two Years

By the end of 2009 TARP monies had largely served their purpose in helping to stabilize the financial sector but unfortunately the stimulus was not as successful in achieving its intended purpose of creating shovel ready jobs and getting American back to work.  By the end of 2009 unemployment had risen from the 7.8% it was when President Obama took office to a near record high of 10%.  In the first 12 months, 4.3 million jobs were shed and total of 4.7 million net jobs were lost through the first 2 years of Obama’s presidency.   Over the same 2 year period a mere 1.5 million jobs were added to the economy, only half what was needed to keep up with population growth alone.

·         At the End of Obama’s First Term
While the unemployment rate did drop from its peak of 10%, by the end of President Obama’s 1st term in office the unemployment remained higher than the 7.8% of when he first took office 4 years earlier and now stood at 8.0%.  And after 4 years in office, the Obama Administration recorded a net loss of nearly one quarter of a million jobs.  All the while, population growth added another 6 million to the number of people in search of employment during President Obama’s first term in office.

 

·         So Far in Obama’s Second Term
It was at the start of Obama’s second term in office that unemployment finally dropped and held below the rate at which it was when he first entered office but it was another year still before the 9 million physical jobs the economy shed were finally recovered.

But recovering the physical jobs is just one piece of the pie, there are still those 125,000 new jobs needed each month to keep pace with population growth that are absent from this equation.

The hole of 20.1 million jobs dug during the recession and subsequent recovery has been offset by 11.8 million jobs created since President Obama first took office, leaving the US at an 8.3 million jobs deficit now, two years into President Obama’s second term in office.


Did the Stimulus Work?
The answer to the question “Did the stimulus work?” all depends on who you ask.  If you were to pose this question to President Obama or any of his economic staff, of course the answer would be a resounding “yes” however, if you were to ask pretty much anyone else you would get a different answer.

An update report released by the CEA, on the effects of the stimulus, concluded that by the end of 2009 between 1 ½ and 2 million jobs were created as a result of the stimulus.  What is uncertain however, is the validity of this claim as in the executive summary of the same report, the authors state that evaluating the impact of the stimulus was “inherently difficult” due to a number of factors.  While none of the “number of factors” were identified in the report, one of those factors was the infusion of TARP money into the economy.

The most telling indicator of the ineffectiveness of the stimulus is the unemployment rate.   The stimulus, a plan intended to immediately put people back to work, seemed to have had an adverse effect on unemployment, although there are certainly other attributing factors.  The two months following the passage of the stimulus were met with sharp upwards unemployment spikes and a year later unemployment remained at a near record high 9.9%.  After two years of stimulus, unemployment managed to drop to 9.0% but this was still seven tenths of a percentage point higher than the month the stimulus was passed.  It would take a full three years before the unemployment rate returned to that of what it was prior to the stimulus.
  
It is hard to say for certain what impact the stimulus may have had on job creation, if any at all, but what is for certain is that the economy shed 3.6 million jobs during the 10 month period covered in the CEA’s evaluation and new jobs creation did not seem to gain any steam until three years after its passage.  While proponents of the Obama Administration will argue that the stimulus simply took longer to take affect that predicted, a more realistic evaluation of what has taken place is that after four years of near economic stagnation caused by over-regulation and uncertainty, the economy went into a self-correcting mode, an argument that most economist would agree with.


When Will All Jobs Lost Be Recovered?

Now that the slowest recovery in over 50 years is finally showing some life, there is hope that all the jobs lost as a result of the Great Recession and slow economic recovery can be recovered.

Taking in to consideration the 4.4 million jobs shed by the economy prior to President Obama taking office; the 4.6 million jobs shed by the economy after he took office and that 125,000 new jobs are needed each month to keep pace with population growth, if the current growth rate of 261,000 jobs per month is maintained {past 12 month average} without interruption, all lost job will be recovered in May of 2020, 11 years and 4 months from the time President Obama was first sworn in to office.