ObamaCare has already cost democrats both the House and the
Senate and could be the unmitigated factor that drives voters to remove them
from the White House in 2016.
Even back in the very early days, when it was still a healthcare reform bill, ObamaCare
struggled to gain popularity amongst Americans and has never in its existence captured
the majority by those in favor of the law verses the number who oppose it. And it was the devious and highly unethical measures
taken by Congressional Democrats to ensure ObamaCare’s passage in to law which caused
the voter revolt that led to their subsequent loss of control over the House or
Representative in 2010.
The burden of ObamaCare has never let up and Democrats trying to protect their
majority in the Senate found themselves in a battle against the unpopular law
again in the 2014 mid-terms. Most Democrats
distanced themself from the faltering law as they made their bid to hold their
senate seat while, in an unprecedented move, a few broke ranks and spoke
negatively of ObamaCare. Even at the insistence
by the president that ObamaCare was a positive campaign issue for Senate Democrats,
those running for re-election refused to make the troubled healthcare law a
part of their campaign message.
But try as they may, Democrats were unable to shake the people’s displeasure with
ObamaCare and were ousted from power in the Senate this past November.
Loved by Republicans and Loathed by Democrats Come 2016
As they kick off the 2016 election cycle, both parties are looking for areas to
gain political footing as well as to identify and remove any obstacles that
might trip them up. On the lists for
both Democrats and Republicans is ObamaCare!
For Republicans it will be business as usual as they will continue to put front
and center the long list of burdens that have befallen upon our economy complements
of ObamaCare. Democrats will have a much
greater challenge. As ObamaCare remains
troublesome and the public call for repeal increases, Democrats will have to do
a great deal more than just distance themselves from the President’s namesake
legislation if they have any hopes of holding the White House.
While no Democrat will say so publically, there are certainly those that are
secretly hoping for ObamaCare to crumble and fall on its own, especially those
Democrats who have been all in with their support and defending of the troubled
law. For those Democrats, speaking out against
ObamaCare would be political suicide however, if they could run a campaign void of having to defend or denounce the
President's healthcare reform law, their
chances in 2016 become significantly brighter.
Helping To Repeal ObamaCare
While many Democrats may secretly be hoping for the self-implosion of ObamaCare
the likelihood of this happening is virtually nil. Short of a US Supreme Court decision to
overturn a major aspect of the law, little can be done to inflict enough pain
on ObamaCare for it to fail on its own, at least not until 2017 at which time the
taxpayer funded safety net the protects insurers from losses expires and
insurance rates will most certainly skyrocket as a result. But this would happen too late to effect the
2016 presidential election cycle.
Of course any attempt by the new congress to repeal the law would be met with
an instant veto by a President who cares more about protecting the single
feather in his cap than the better good of the American people. However, if ObamaCare did in fact take a turn
for the worst, one cannot help but wonder to what point will Democrats continue
let the law fail before they would be compelled to take action?
There is only so much distance that can be created between ObamaCare and those Democrats
who are putting in a presidential bid for 2016 and you can be assured they will
be taken to task regarding their past and current position on the law
throughout the campaign season. If ObamaCare
continues to lose popularity, at some point it will simply become too controversial
and unpopular for Democrats to overcome.
ObamaCare is Already Walking on Thin Ice
A challenge has been raised {King v Burwell} over the Federal Government’s authority
to distribute tax subsidies for healthcare plans sold through the federal
exchange and is under review by the Supreme Court. If the plaintiffs were to win this challenge
it would disallow subsidies to be distributed to those who have purchased
healthcare plans through the federal exchange subsequently increasing their
premiums, in some cases significantly.
This would likely cause a large number of individuals to seek out other
forms of insurance off the exchange. As
well, many would find insurance unaffordable and would end up uninsured. These loses would be a major
blow to the fiscal well-being of ObamaCare.
Enrollment on the exchanges also remains to be a challenge as the long term uninsured
individuals that the administration believed would flood the marketplace to take
advantage of the affordable offerings provided by ObamaCare have so far failed
to materialize. As it looks now, enrollment
might meet 50% of the administrations original projection for 2016 which would
be devistating. Democrats have remained quiet
on the issue of ObamaCare enrollment but are watching closely in hopes that the
weak participation by the uninsured turns around. But in all honestly, there is little hope of an
enrollment boom by the uninsured happening.
The bi-partisan supported repeal of the medical device tax could also spell
trouble for ObamaCare. While the revenue
generated by the medical device tax is small potatoes in comparison to most of
the other revenue streams that have been created to help fund ObamaCare, the fear
is that a repeal of the medical device tax could set a precedence for the repeal
of other much larger revenue streams of the law, revenue streams which would be significantly
harder to replace if they could be replaced at all.
None of these issues could put an immediate end to ObamaCare however, they could
certainly set the wheels in motion and make defending the law ever more difficult than it already is for
those Democrats looking to the White House in 2016.
What Does This All Mean?
The day following the Democrat's defeat in the recent mid-term election, while acknowledging
the new Senate, President Obama made it clear that the one thing that was off
the table was the repeal of ObamaCare, so long as he was president.
Had the President made this claim a year ago, when nobody was really thinking about
2016 yet, most would have probably agreed that a repeal of ObamaCare would be
impossible. But 2016 is not all that far
away now and ObamaCare still remains to be the single greatest obstacle Democrats
have repeatedly had to face.
ObamaCare has been a thorn in the side of Democrats since before it was passed
into law. Not only will this nagging
pain not go away but it continues to spread like an untreated cancer. Left unchecked it will eventually kill any hope
Democrats have in maintaining control of the White House. And like any cancer, the best way to prevent
its spread is by removing it as soon as possible. Doing so to ObamaCare might not be as
unlikely to happen as many might think.
Democrats have begun to turn away from preserving the president’s legacy and
are becoming more involved with their own self-preservation. In doing so, if Democrats find ObamaCare to
be an albatross around their neck, do not think for a moment that they will not
rid themselves of this burden. It would
take only 44 democrats in the House and 13 in the Senate to side with Republicans
and override a presidential veto of an ObamaCare repeal.
This may have seemed an impossibility a year or even six months ago but
with the growing unpopularity of both the president and his namesake healthcare
law, the possibility of Democrats jumping on the repeal bandwagon grows
stronger each day. From a voter perspective
standpoint, the sooner ObamaCare is repealed the better. Siding to repeal ObamaCare as a last ditch
effort to hold the White House would reflect poorly on Democrats who would, up until
that point, have been defending the law through the campaign cycle. There would be far more anger than forgiveness
available from voters at the midnight hour.
2016 is still two years away which gives Democrats plenty of time to recover
from the political tongue lashing that will ensue if they do turn on the law which
they have so deeply invested themselves in.
The wounds will heal however, and with any luck a bi-partisan approach
to healthcare reform will be well in the works come election time, which would score
Democrats major points with voters who have been soured by the Obama
Administration. On the other hand, if Democrats
lose the White House in 2016, ObamaCare will most certainly be repealed anyway
so there is a great deal of incentive for Democrats to switch gears and work
with Republicans now and remove this thorn from their side.
No comments:
Post a Comment